The John Doe order protecting Raj Shamani has been making headlines over the last few days. This moment is pushing the industry to reconsider how we protect identity, credibility, and personal rights online.

The John Doe Order Protecting Raj Shamani and Why It Matters

Raj Shamani isn’t just a creator. He is a full-scale digital brand with a solid following of13.2 million subscribers on YouTube, viral interviews on Figuring Out, and a notable influence in business, entrepreneurship, and culture. Shamani argued before the Delhi High Court that his visibility has made him a target for deepfakes, fake ads, impersonation accounts, scam Telegram channels, edited clips, and even booking websites falsely claiming to offer him for appearances. In short, his identity was stolen, reshaped, and sold without his consent.

The Court Steps In: What Exactly Is a John Doe Order Protecting Raj Shamani?

Earlier last week, the Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Shamani’s personality rights by issuing a John Doe Order. A John Doe Order is a strong legal tool that lets courts act against unknown people who violate someone’s rights, especially helpful when creators don’t know who runs fake accounts, deepfakes, or scams. This order allows you to combat impersonators you can’t identify yet. This John Doe order came after Shamani and his production company filed a suit to stop any unauthorized use of his name, image, voice, likeness, or podcast content.

Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora recognized that Shamani’s identity has significant commercial value tied to endorsements, brand equity, and influence that makes these parts legally protectable.

Deepfakes, Fake Endorsements and AI Impersonation: What the Court Found

Senior Advocate Diya Kapur presented a detailed record of the digital misuse. Shamani had grievances like AI-generated deepfake videos endorsing betting apps, fake crypto promotions using his face and voice, edited clips turning into misleading ads, chatbots impersonating him, scam pages selling event bookings for him, vulgar parody content affecting his credibility, misuse of his podcast branding, logos, and IP The Court acknowledged all of this as serious damage to his reputation and confirmed that Shamani’s identity elements, including his face, voice, name, mannerisms, and content, are legally protected personality rights.

Platforms like Google, Meta, and Telegram were directed to remove infringing content, block fake accounts, and share basic subscriber information of infringing users within 72 hours. The next hearing is set for 24 April 2026.

Interestingly, not everything gets blocked though. The Court declined to ban hashtags containing his name completely, stating that public figures must allow room for commentary, criticism, and discussion. As the judge mentioned, “You are a public persona. You will have to give that much leeway.”

What This Means for All Creators in India

This John Doe order protecting Raj Shamani is not just a personal victory. It sets a standard for every digital creator navigating an AI-driven landscape where identity theft requires no effort, just a tool and a few clicks. By recognizing that a creator’s digital persona is intellectual property, the Court has signaled that India is ready to enforce stronger protections for identity rights, deepfake misuse, digital impersonation, and content theft.

In a time when AI can clone your face faster than you can post a reel, this moment serves as a hopeful reminder. Creators may be vulnerable in the digital storm, but they are not powerless. With the right laws, awareness, and collective effort, the industry can move toward a future where innovation thrives without compromising identity, dignity, or trust. This is a win not just for Raj Shamani, but for every creator building something real in an unreal time.

FAQs